Skip to framework content
NEWVenvera speaks your language: the full platform, in English, German, Spanish, Bulgarian, Arabic and Chinese.See what’s new →

DORA compliance software

Bring your DORA work into one clear view.

Connect ICT risks, provider records, resilience testing and evidence in one DORA workspace. Give every review a clear starting point and every gap a next step.

14-day Professional trial · no credit card required

Inside VenveraProduct preview
DORA workspace: control coverage and programme progress.
DORA workspace: control coverage and programme progress.
Real product screen · example dataExplore the workflow

A practical way to move forward

Know the work. See the progress.

One workspace for the requirements, the people doing the work and the records behind your next review.

ICT risk

See what needs attention.

Review DORA control coverage and assess gaps alongside your ICT risk work. Bring the open issues into the same conversation as the evidence behind them.

  • Framework controls and gap assessments
  • Connected risk and remediation work
Provider oversight

Build a register you can maintain.

Keep providers, contracts and critical functions organised in the Register of Information. Prepare the xBRL-CSV export from your recorded data and review it before submission.

  • Provider, contract and function records
  • Register validation and export workflow
Resilience

Keep testing and follow-up visible.

Record resilience tests and follow up on findings. Connect the framework to your incident and third-party work so the next review starts with a shared record.

  • Resilience test records and schedules
  • Linked incident and supplier workflows

The detail behind the dashboard

Give every review a better starting point.

Move from a progress summary to the records that support it. Keep the next conversation focused on the work that needs attention.

Screens show example data. Shared platform features and availability depend on your plan.

See it with our team
Register of Information: export preparation in Venvera.
Register of Information: export preparation in Venvera.Open full size

Start with the right scope

For risk, compliance and security teams in financial services.

DORA sets digital operational resilience requirements for financial entities in scope, with a separate oversight framework for designated critical ICT providers. Confirm your entity’s obligations before setting your programme scope.

EBA: Digital Operational Resilience Act (opens in a new tab)

Use the work you already have

Find the overlap. Review the gaps.

Explore shared requirements and download a CSV. A mapping identifies related work; it does not certify compliance.

Explore DORA control mappings
You already run
You have been asked to add
27 of the 53 domains in this crosswalk appear in both NIS2 and DORA.
DomainNIS2DORA
Encryption
Art. 21(2)(h)Are policies and procedures in place governing the use of cryptography, including encryption standards for data at rest and in transit?
Art. 9(4)(d)Is data encrypted at rest and in transit using industry-standard cryptographic techniques, with documented key management procedures?
Access Control
Art. 21(2)(i)Is there a formal access control policy enforcing least privilege principle, with documented procedures for access provisioning and de-provisioning?
Art. 9(4)(c)Is there a formal identity and access management policy enforcing least privilege, multi-factor authentication for critical systems, and regular access recertification?
Identity Management
Art. 21(2)(i)Is there a formal access control policy enforcing least privilege principle, with documented procedures for access provisioning and de-provisioning?
Art. 9(4)(c)Is there a formal identity and access management policy enforcing least privilege, multi-factor authentication for critical systems, and regular access recertification?
Authentication & MFA
Art. 21(2)(j)Is multi-factor authentication or continuous authentication deployed for access to critical systems, remote access, and privileged accounts?
Art. 9(4)(c)Is there a formal identity and access management policy enforcing least privilege, multi-factor authentication for critical systems, and regular access recertification?
Network Security
Art. 21(2)(g)Are basic cyber hygiene practices established and enforced, including patching, password policies, device management, and network segmentation?
Art. 9(4)(b)Are network security controls (segmentation, firewalls, intrusion prevention) implemented to protect ICT systems, with regular review and hardening?
Vulnerability Management
Art. 21(2)(e)Is there a vulnerability handling and disclosure process that ensures timely identification, assessment, and remediation of vulnerabilities?
Art. 9(4)(a)Is there a formal patch and vulnerability management process that ensures timely remediation of identified vulnerabilities in all ICT systems?
Logging & Monitoring
Art. 21(2)(f)Are security metrics and KPIs defined, tracked, and reported to management to measure the effectiveness of cybersecurity controls?
Art. 10(1)–(4)Do you operate continuous monitoring and detection capabilities (SIEM, IDS/IPS, anomaly detection) to promptly identify ICT-related incidents and anomalous activities?
Incident Management
Art. 21(2)(b)Is there a documented incident handling procedure covering detection, analysis, containment, eradication, and recovery phases?
Art. 17(1)–(2)Do you have a documented ICT incident management process covering detection, recording, classification, escalation, response, and closure?
Incident Classification
Art. 23(3)Are incident classification criteria documented, distinguishing significant incidents based on impact on service provision, affected users, duration, and geographic scope?
Art. 18(1)Are incidents classified as major or non-major using documented criteria aligned with DORA thresholds?
Art. 18(1)(a)–(g)Does classification consider all DORA quantitative criteria: number of clients affected, transaction value, duration, geographic spread, data losses, criticality of affected services, and economic impact?
Incident Reporting
Art. 23(4)(a)–(b)Can your organisation submit an early warning to the CSIRT within 24 hours and an incident notification within 72 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident?
Art. 19(4)(a)Can your organisation submit initial incident notifications to the competent authority within 4 hours of classifying an ICT incident as major?
Art. 19(4)(b)–(c)Do you have processes and templates to submit the intermediate report (within 72 hours) and final report (within 1 month) for major ICT incidents?
Incident Response Team
Art. 21(2)(b)Is there a documented incident handling procedure covering detection, analysis, containment, eradication, and recovery phases?
Art. 17(2)Is a dedicated incident response team established with defined roles, escalation paths, on-call procedures, and authority to act during ICT incidents?
Post-Incident Review
Art. 21(2)(b)Do you perform post-incident reviews for significant incidents, with root cause analysis and lessons learned fed into risk management improvements?
Art. 17(3)Do you perform formal post-incident reviews with root cause analysis for all major ICT incidents, with findings fed back into the risk management framework?
Business Continuity
Art. 21(2)(c)Are business continuity and disaster recovery plans documented, covering all critical services, with defined RTO/RPO targets and tested at least annually?
Art. 11(1)–(11)Are ICT business continuity and disaster recovery plans documented, tested at least annually, approved by management, and covering all critical business functions?
Backup & Restoration
Art. 21(2)(c)Are backup procedures implemented with defined scope, frequency, and secure off-site storage, with regular restoration testing?
Art. 12(1)–(7)Do you maintain backup and restoration policies specifying scope, frequency, and secure storage locations, with regular restoration testing?
Crisis Management
Art. 21(2)(c)Is there a crisis management framework with defined escalation procedures, communication plans, and designated crisis management team?
Art. 14(1)–(2)Are ICT crisis communication plans documented, defining internal and external notification procedures, roles, and responsible disclosure policies?
Third-Party Risk Management
Art. 21(2)(d)Is there a documented supply chain security policy covering ICT product and service procurement, with security requirements for suppliers?
Art. 28(2)Has the management body approved an ICT third-party risk strategy that is aligned with the overall ICT risk management framework and reviewed at least annually?
Supplier Due Diligence
Art. 21(2)(d)Do you assess the cybersecurity posture and practices of direct suppliers and service providers before entering into agreements?
Art. 28(4)Is thorough due diligence and risk assessment performed before entering into new ICT third-party arrangements, particularly for critical or important functions?
Supplier Contracts
Art. 21(2)(d)Do supplier contracts include cybersecurity requirements, incident notification obligations, and audit/assessment rights?
Art. 30(2)(a)Do ICT third-party contracts include clear service level agreements (SLAs) with quantitative performance targets, monitoring measures, and consequences for non-compliance?
Art. 30(3)(e)Do contracts for critical or important ICT services include unrestricted rights of audit and inspection, including on-site access and use of pooled audits?
Supplier Monitoring
Art. 21(2)(d)Are supply chain risks and supplier cybersecurity performance monitored on an ongoing basis, with periodic re-assessment?
Art. 28(5)Are critical or important ICT third-party providers subject to continuous monitoring and formal performance reviews at least annually?
Risk Assessment
Art. 21(2)(a)Is there a formal, documented risk analysis methodology that identifies and assesses cybersecurity risks to network and information systems?
Art. 8(2)–(6)Is there a formal ICT risk identification and assessment process performed at least annually, after significant changes, and after major ICT incidents?
Information Security Policy
Art. 21(2)(a)Has the management body approved a comprehensive information security policy covering all network and information systems, reviewed at least annually?
Art. 9(1)–(2)Are comprehensive ICT security policies and standards documented, approved by management, communicated to all staff, and reviewed regularly?
Security Awareness Training
Art. 20(2), Art. 21(2)(g)Is there a cybersecurity awareness and training programme for all staff, including management body members, with regular refresher sessions?
Art. 13(6)Is there an ICT security awareness and training programme covering all staff (including management) that is updated regularly and includes DORA-specific obligations?
Change Management
Art. 21(2)(e)Is there a formal change management process for network and information systems that includes security impact assessment and testing?
Art. 9(4)(e)Are ICT change management procedures in place to ensure controlled, tested, and approved modifications to ICT systems and applications?
Security Testing
Art. 21(2)(f)Are there defined policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures, including regular security testing?
Art. 24(1)–(2)Have you established a digital operational resilience testing programme that is risk-based, covers critical ICT systems, and is reviewed at least annually?
Penetration Testing
Art. 21(2)(f)Are there defined policies and procedures to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity risk-management measures, including regular security testing?
Art. 25(1)Are penetration tests conducted at least annually on critical ICT systems, simulating real-world attack scenarios?
Breach Notification
Art. 23(4)(a)–(b)Can your organisation submit an early warning to the CSIRT within 24 hours and an incident notification within 72 hours of becoming aware of a significant incident?
Art. 19(4)(a)Can your organisation submit initial incident notifications to the competent authority within 4 hours of classifying an ICT incident as major?
Human Oversight
Art. 20(1)Does the management body receive regular (at least quarterly) reports on cybersecurity risk posture and treatment progress?
Art. 5(1)–(2)Has the management body defined, approved, and assumed ultimate responsibility for an ICT risk management framework with clear roles, responsibilities, and reporting lines?

A row means the two requirements cover the same ground, so one implementation and one set of evidence can usually serve both. It does not mean satisfying one certifies the other: each framework keeps its own scope, wording and assessment, and some requirements have no counterpart at all. Treat this as a starting map for planning, then confirm each row against the requirement text.

Go deeper

Your DORA reading list.

Visit the knowledge centre

Before you get started

A few useful answers.

Want to discuss your framework and current process?

Talk it through with us
Does Venvera submit our DORA register for us?

Venvera helps you prepare and export the Register of Information. Your team reviews the data and completes submission through the channel required by your competent authority.

Is the DORA module only for financial entities?

The core workflow supports financial entities managing DORA obligations. ICT suppliers can also organise evidence for customer reviews, but supplying a financial entity does not automatically place a provider under the same obligations or the critical-provider oversight regime.

Can we use our existing evidence?

Yes. Bring your policies and supporting evidence into Venvera and link them to the relevant controls. Cross-framework mappings help you identify reusable work; your team still reviews whether the evidence meets each requirement.

What is included in the trial?

The 14-day Professional trial includes up to five frameworks and unlimited users, with no credit card required. You can explore the controls, assess gaps and organise your compliance work. Framework modules are on paid plans; compare plans for feature availability.

DORA by Venvera

Give your next review a clearer starting point.

14-day Professional trial · no credit card required · up to 5 frameworks · unlimited users