Venvera

EU AI ACT COMPLIANCE SOFTWARE: AI SYSTEM CLASSIFICATION AND CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT

Classify your AI systems by risk level, run conformity assessments for high-risk systems, conduct Fundamental Rights Impact Assessments, document datasets, and track post-market monitoring obligations from one platform.

What is the EU AI Act and Which AI Systems Must Comply? The EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) is the world's first comprehensive legal framework for artificial intelligence. It uses a risk-based approach with four levels: prohibited AI practices, high-risk AI systems (subject to strict requirements including conformity assessment), limited-risk systems (transparency obligations), and minimal-risk systems. High-risk AI in financial services includes credit scoring, insurance risk assessment, and fraud detection systems.

AI Act Art. 6AI Act Art. 27AI Act Art. 43DORA + NIS2 Mapped

EU AI Act compliance dashboard with AI system inventory, risk classification, and conformity tracker

AI SYSTEM RISK CLASSIFICATION ACROSS ALL FOUR LEVELS

The EU AI Act classifies AI systems into four risk levels: Unacceptable (prohibited), High-Risk (strict requirements), Limited Risk (transparency obligations), and Minimal Risk (no specific requirements). Venvera provides a structured classification workflow that evaluates each AI system against the criteria in Annexes I and III, determines the applicable risk level, and identifies the specific obligations that apply. The classification is documented with evidence and reasoning, creating a defensible record for regulatory inquiries.

  • Guided classification against Annex I and Annex III criteria
  • Prohibited use case screening with automatic flagging
  • High-risk determination with sector and use case analysis
  • Limited risk transparency obligation identification
  • Classification rationale documentation with evidence trail

AI system risk classification workflow with four-level assessment

CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT FOR HIGH-RISK AI SYSTEMS

High-risk AI systems must undergo a conformity assessment before market placement. Venvera structures this process across all six requirement categories: risk management, data governance, technical documentation, record-keeping, transparency, and human oversight. Each requirement is tracked from gap identification through implementation to evidence collection. The platform generates the EU Declaration of Conformity and maintains the technical documentation package required under Article 11.

  • All six high-risk requirement categories tracked
  • Implementation status per requirement with evidence attachment
  • Technical documentation package generation (Article 11)
  • EU Declaration of Conformity preparation
  • Post-market monitoring plan documentation

Conformity assessment dashboard for high-risk AI systems

FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS IMPACT ASSESSMENT (FRIA)

Article 27 requires deployers of high-risk AI systems in public services to conduct a Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment before putting the system into use. Venvera provides structured FRIA templates that evaluate impact across non-discrimination, privacy, data protection, freedom of expression, human dignity, and access to essential services. Each fundamental right is scored for likelihood and severity of impact, with mitigation measures tracked to implementation.

  • Structured assessment templates for each fundamental right
  • Impact scoring matrix (likelihood and severity per right)
  • Affected population identification and documentation
  • Mitigation measure planning with implementation tracking
  • FRIA report generation for regulatory submission

Fundamental Rights Impact Assessment with scoring matrix and mitigation tracking

DATASET DOCUMENTATION AND DATA GOVERNANCE

Article 10 requires high-risk AI systems to be developed using training, validation, and testing datasets that meet quality criteria including relevance, representativeness, and freedom from errors. Venvera provides structured dataset documentation templates covering data sources, collection methodologies, annotation processes, bias assessments, and quality metrics. Each dataset is linked to the AI system it supports, creating a complete data lineage trail.

  • Dataset inventory with source and methodology documentation
  • Bias assessment templates with mitigation tracking
  • Data quality metrics: completeness, accuracy, representativeness
  • Training, validation, and testing dataset separation tracking
  • Data lineage linking datasets to AI systems and versions

Dataset documentation and data governance dashboard for AI systems

POST-MARKET MONITORING AND PERFORMANCE TRACKING

Providers of high-risk AI systems must establish and document a post-market monitoring system proportionate to the nature and risks of the AI system. Venvera tracks monitoring plans with defined KPIs, performance thresholds, review schedules, and escalation triggers. When performance degrades or incidents occur, the platform links to corrective action workflows and regulatory reporting processes.

  • Monitoring plan documentation with KPI definitions
  • Performance threshold configuration and breach alerting
  • Periodic review scheduling with automated reminders
  • Corrective action workflows triggered by performance issues
  • Monitoring evidence collection for regulatory review

AI system post-market monitoring dashboard with KPI tracking

SERIOUS INCIDENT REPORTING FOR AI SYSTEMS

Providers of high-risk AI systems must report serious incidents to market surveillance authorities. Venvera provides structured incident classification against AI Act severity criteria, deadline tracking, and pre-formatted report templates. AI incidents are linked to the specific AI system, its risk classification, and the conformity assessment, giving regulators a complete picture. See the full incident management module for details.

  • AI-specific incident classification criteria
  • Serious incident determination workflow
  • Pre-formatted report templates for market surveillance authorities
  • Incident-to-AI-system linking with conformity context
  • Corrective action tracking with root cause analysis

AI incident reporting dashboard with classification and deadline tracking

EU AI ACT COMPLIANCE: VENVERA VS AD-HOC APPROACHES

Capability
Ad-Hoc Approach
Venvera
Risk Classification
Ad-hoc legal analysis, inconsistent methodology
Structured classification with Annex I/III criteria
Conformity Assessment
No structured process, manual documentation
Six-category workflow with evidence tracking
FRIA
No standard template, subjective evaluation
Structured templates with scoring and mitigation tracking
Dataset Documentation
Scattered notes, no bias tracking
Complete data lineage with quality metrics and bias assessment
Post-Market Monitoring
No formal plan, reactive approach
Defined KPIs with thresholds and automated alerting
Incident Reporting
No AI-specific classification
AI Act criteria with deadline tracking and reporting templates

4

Risk classification levels assessed

6

Conformity requirement categories

FRIA

Fundamental rights assessment built in

Aug 2026

Full high-risk requirements deadline

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE EU AI ACT

READY TO PREPARE FOR EU AI ACT COMPLIANCE?

Start with a free trial. Inventory your AI systems, classify them by risk level, and begin your first conformity assessment in under 30 minutes. No credit card required.

AES-256 Encryption
EU Data Residency
SOC 2 Certified