We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.
Best

We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.

·Alexander Sverdlov
Editorial illustration related to We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.

Let me start with something you won't read in most "alternative to Sprinto" articles: Sprinto is actually decent for ISO 27001.

I know. Not the dramatic opening you expected. But I'm not going to pretend Sprinto is terrible at ISO 27001 when it's not. Their platform covers the standard reasonably well - control mapping to Annex A clauses, evidence collection automation, audit preparation workflows. For a mid-market company going through its first ISO 27001 certification, Sprinto at $8K-10K/year is a legitimate choice.

So why did we switch? Because ISO 27001 was just the beginning of our compliance journey, and Sprinto couldn't follow us where we needed to go. Here's the story - and the math - behind that decision.

THE PROBLEM

The "ISO 27001 Plus Everything Else" Problem

Live compliance dashboard preview related to We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.

ISO 27001 certification was our entry point. Standard story. Then the requirements started stacking. Quarter two: GDPR audit. Quarter three: DORA. Quarter four: NIS2. Quarter five: AI Act. Five frameworks in eighteen months - and Sprinto could only handle one of them.

⚠ Warning: Framework stacking is the norm, not the exception

This isn't unusual - it's actually the normal trajectory for a European mid-market company once regulatory obligations start compounding. Sprinto can handle ISO 27001 and SOC 2. For GDPR, DORA, NIS2, and AI Act, you're either using spreadsheets, hiring consultants, or just hoping nobody checks. None of those strategies scale.

🔍
GAP ANALYSIS

Where Sprinto Falls Short - Even for ISO 27001

Key statistics infographic for We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.
📊

Risk Assessment Depth

Clause 6.1.2 requires sophisticated risk methodology with treatment plans. Sprinto's assessment is too basic for a mature ISMS.

📄

Statement of Applicability

The SoA is your most important ISMS document. Sprinto's version isn't as rigorous as experienced certification auditors expect.

👥

Management Review

Clause 9.3 requires documented reviews with specific inputs and outputs. Sprinto doesn't provide structured management review support.

🔧

Nonconformity Tracking

Clause 10 requires documented NCRs, corrective actions, continual improvement. Sprinto tracks control status but not structured NCR workflows.

🔎

Internal Audit Depth

Clause 9.2 requires audit scheduling, findings tracking, and follow-up. Sprinto's audit capability is limited for mature ISMS programmes.

🔗

European Frameworks

DORA, NIS2, GDPR, AI Act - none available in Sprinto. When frameworks stack, you need additional tools, subscriptions, and reconciliation.

FEATURE COMPARISON

Head-to-Head: ISO 27001 and Beyond

Step-by-step process flow for We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.
Capability Sprinto Venvera
ISO 27001 Control Mapping ✓ Good ✓ Full Annex A (2022)
Risk Assessment Depth ◯ Basic ✓ Full methodology + treatment plans
Statement of Applicability ◯ Basic ✓ Comprehensive SoA generation
Internal Audit Tracking ◯ Limited ✓ Scheduling + findings tracking
Nonconformity Management ✗ Not available ✓ Full NCR + corrective action workflow
European Frameworks (DORA, NIS2, GDPR, AI Act) ✗ Not available ✓ 13 frameworks total
Cross-Framework Mapping ◯ SOC 2 ↔ ISO only ✓ 150+ mappings, 13 frameworks
SOC 2 Automation ✓ Strong ✓ Full coverage
Cloud Integrations (AWS/GCP/Azure) ✓ Extensive ◯ Growing
EU Data Hosting ✗ No guarantee ✓ Amsterdam, AES-256-GCM
🔬
DEEP DIVE

The ISO 27001:2022 Update Factor

Vendor comparison strip illustrating We Used Sprinto for ISO 27001. It Worked. Then We Needed More.

ISO 27001 was updated in 2022 with a significantly restructured Annex A. The old 114 controls across 14 domains became 93 controls across 4 themes. Eleven new controls were introduced, covering threat intelligence, cloud security, ICT readiness for business continuity, and data masking. Both Sprinto and Venvera support the 2022 standard.

Where Venvera goes further

Venvera maps the new 2022 controls to other frameworks. A.5.23 (Cloud security) maps to DORA's third-party risk management. A.5.7 (Threat intelligence) maps to NIS2 Article 21. These cross-framework connections between the 2022 update and European regulations save significant time when managing multiple frameworks simultaneously.

🔗
CROSS-FRAMEWORK VALUE

Controls We'd Already Done - We Just Didn't Know It

✓ 65% of ISO 27001 was already done from SOC 2

Controls we'd implemented for SOC 2 covered about 65% of ISO 27001 Annex A requirements. Venvera showed us that immediately - not as a vague assertion, but as specific, control-by-control mapping. "Your CC6.1 access control implementation satisfies ISO 27001 A.9.1.1 and A.9.1.2. Here's what's still missing." That level of specificity eliminated roughly 40% of duplicate documentation work.

💰
PRICING COMPARISON

Let's Do the Maths

Cost Component Sprinto + Manual Venvera (3 Frameworks)
Sprinto (ISO + SOC 2) ~$10,000/yr Included
GDPR consultant ~€15,000/yr Included
NIS2 gap assessment ~€12,000 Included
Reconciliation analyst time ~€8,000/yr €0 (cross-mapping)
Annual Total ~€45,000+/yr €10,788/yr
Annual Savings with Venvera Save €34,000+/yr
🇪🇺
DATA SOVEREIGNTY

Amsterdam-Hosted. Per-Tenant Encrypted.

For European organisations, having your ISMS documentation stored in the EU isn't just a preference - it's increasingly an expectation. Venvera is hosted in Amsterdam with AES-256-GCM encryption per tenant. No data transfer concerns. When your certification auditor or regulator asks about data residency, you've got a clean answer.

WHO SHOULD SWITCH

The Verdict

☑ Switch to Venvera if:

☑ You need ISO 27001 plus any other framework (GDPR, NIS2, DORA, AI Act)

☑ Your ISMS is maturing beyond basic control mapping

☑ You need proper risk assessment, SoA, and NCR workflows

☑ You want cross-framework mapping to eliminate duplicate work

☑ EU data hosting matters to your organisation or customers

If ISO 27001 is genuinely your only compliance obligation, Sprinto is a cost-effective, competent choice. Don't switch for the sake of switching. At ~$8K-10K/year, Sprinto delivers genuine value for ISO 27001 and SOC 2. But the moment you need a second European framework, the total cost of ownership shifts dramatically in favour of a unified platform.

ISO 27001 + Whatever Comes Next

Start with ISO 27001, expand to DORA, GDPR, NIS2, AI Act, and 8 more - all with cross-framework mapping.

From €399/mo (1 framework) | €899/mo (3 frameworks) - hosted in Amsterdam.

Book a Demo →

Last updated: March 2026. Pricing and feature information based on publicly available data and direct experience. Sprinto is a trademark of Sprinto Technologies Pvt. Ltd.

Alexander Sverdlov

Alexander Sverdlov

CEO & Founder

Alexander is the founder of Venvera and a 20+ year veteran of European cybersecurity and compliance. He has led security and risk programmes for regulated financial institutions, fintechs and SaaS companies operating under DORA, NIS2, GDPR, ISO 27001 and the EU AI Act. Before Venvera, he founded Atlant Security, an offensive security consultancy that ran penetration tests, red-team exercises and ISO 27001 readiness programmes for clients across the EU and the Middle East. He writes on the cross-framework realities of running modern compliance: how to map one control to many obligations, where the spreadsheets fall apart, and what regulators are actually asking for once the auditor sits down.

More articles by Alexander

RELATED POSTS